�౦��Ϸ����

Summary

On September 13, 2011, the �౦��Ϸ���� Board of Directors (�౦��Ϸ���� Board) adopted the attached guidelines describing the process that the �౦��Ϸ���� will follow to determine whether to make an adjustment to the score used to calculate the deposit insurance assessment rate for a large or highly complex institution, to determine the size of any adjustment, and to notify an institution of an adjustment. Deposit insurance assessment rates are determined according to the Final Rule on Assessments and Large Bank Pricing that was approved by the �౦��Ϸ���� Board on February 7, 2011. The guidelines apply to institutions with $10 billion or more in assets.

Statement of Applicability to Institutions under $1 Billion: The guidelines have no impact on institutions with less than $1 billion in assets.

Highlights

• For quarters beginning April 1, 2011, and thereafter, the �౦��Ϸ���� began using a new methodology for determining assessment rates for highly complex and other large insured depository institutions. [Assessments, Large Bank Pricing, 76 Fed Reg. 10672 (Feb. 25, 2011)].
• The new methodology combines CAMELS ratings and forward-looking financial measures into one of two scorecards, one for highly complex institutions and another for all other large institutions, to produce a total score.
• The �౦��Ϸ���� may make a limited adjustment to an institution's total score based upon risks that are not adequately captured in the scorecard.
• Institutions may make a written request to the �౦��Ϸ���� for an adjustment that is supported by evidence of a material risk or risk-mitigating factor that is not adequately accounted for in the scorecard.
• The guidelines, which are attached, provide examples of circumstances that might give rise to an adjustment.
• The guidelines supersede the large bank pricing adjustment guidelines published on May 15, 2007.

Continuation of FIL-64-2011 

Distribution

All �౦��Ϸ����-Insured Institutions

Suggested Routing

Chief Executive Officer

President

Chief Financial Officer

Note

�౦��Ϸ���� financial institution letters (FILs) may be accessed from the �౦��Ϸ����'s Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/news/financial-institution-letters/2011.

To receive FILs electronically, please visit http://www.fdic.gov/about/subscriptions/fil.html .

Paper copies of �౦��Ϸ���� financial institution letters may be obtained through the �౦��Ϸ����'s Public Information Center, 3501 Fairfax Drive, E-1002, Arlington, VA 22226 (1-877-275-3342 or 703-562-2200).

Additional Related Topics

• �౦��Ϸ���� Regulations Governing the Assessment Process, 12 CFR Part 327

Financial Institution Letters 
FIL-64-2011 
September 14, 2011

Assessments
Statement of Applicability to Institutions under $1 Billion

The assessment rate adjustment guidelines apply only to institutions with $10 billion or more in assets. The guidelines have no impact on institutions with less than $1 billion in assets.

Assessment Rate Adjustment Guidelines for Large and Highly Complex Institutions

On February 7, 2011, the �౦��Ϸ���� Board of Directors (�౦��Ϸ���� Board) amended its assessment regulations and established a new methodology for calculating deposit insurance assessment rates for highly complex and other large insured institutions [Large Bank Pricing Rule, 76 Fed. Reg. 10672 (Feb. 25, 2011)]. The new methodology combines CAMELS ratings and financial measures to produce a score that is converted into an institution's assessment rate. The Large Bank Pricing Rule authorizes the �౦��Ϸ���� to adjust an institution's total score by 15 points, up or down. On September 13, 2011, the �౦��Ϸ���� Bard adopted the attached guidelines describing the process that the �౦��Ϸ���� will follow to determine whether to make an adjustment, to determine the size of any adjustment, and to notify an institution of an adjustment. The guidelines also provide examples of circumstances that might give rise to an adjustment.

Brief Summary of Approach

• The �౦��Ϸ���� will focus on identifying institutions for which a combination of risk measures and other information suggests either materially higher or lower risk than their total scores indicate (an adjustment of at least five points).
• The �౦��Ϸ���� will primarily consider two types of information in determining whether to make an adjustment: (1) a scorecard ratio or measure that exceeds the maximum cutoff value for that ratio or measure or is less than the minimum cutoff value, along with the degree to which the ratio or measure differs from the cutoff value; and (2) information not directly captured in the scorecard, including complementary quantitative risk measures and qualitative risk considerations.
• The �౦��Ϸ���� will consult with an institution's primary federal regulator and appropriate state banking supervisor before making or removing an adjustment.
• An institution will have an opportunity to respond before increasing a score or removing a decrease in score.
• An institution may make a written request to the �౦��Ϸ���� for an adjustment to its total score. The institution's request must be supported with evidence of a material risk or risk-mitigating factor that is not adequately captured or considered in the scorecard. An institution-initiated request should be received by the �౦��Ϸ���� no later than 35 days following the end of the quarter for which the institution is requesting the adjustment. An institution-initiated request for adjustment received later may not provide the �౦��Ϸ���� sufficient time to appropriately assess and respond to the request for adjustment; therefore, requests received after this deadline may not be considered until the following quarter.
• An institution may request review of, or appeal, adjustment decisions pursuant to 12 CFR 327.4(c). An institution may similarly request review of, or appeal, a decision not to apply an adjustment following a request by the institution for an adjustment.
• While the �౦��Ϸ���� is not precluded from making an adjustment immediately following adoption of these guidelines, the �౦��Ϸ���� intends to initially make few, if any, adjustments until it develops a thorough understanding of the impact of the new pricing system.

Arthur J. Murton

Director

Division of Insurance and Research